Science
Nugget—Unveiling a Supermassive Black Hole at the Center
of Our Galaxy
Andrea Ghez and Nevin Weinberg
Astronomers
are presently closing in on proof that one of the most enigmatic
objects in our Universe - a supermassive black hole - lurks at
the heart of our own galaxy, the Milky Way. Over the last decade,
near-infrared diffraction-limited imaging with 10 meter class
telescopes has revealed that several of the stars near the Galactic
center (GC) are moving on elliptical trajectories with velocities
as large as 12,000 km/sec, a few percent the speed of light (see
Figure 1). These motions can only be explained if the stars are
orbiting a central dark mass 4 x 106 times more massive
than the Sun, confined within a volume only 45 AU on a side.
These measurements provide the most definitive evidence for the
existence of a supermassive black hole (BH), not only at the
center of our galaxy, but more broadly of any galaxy in our Universe
(Ghez et al. 2003, 2005; Schodel et al. 2002, 2003). Because
the center of the Milky Way is 100 times closer than the next
closest galaxy, the GC presents a unique opportunity to study
a supermassive BH and its environs in much more detail than is
possible in any other galaxy.

Figure
2. Astrometric positions for a mock sample of 100
stars detectable with the TMT. Motions are over a
10 yr baseline assuming ten observations per year
per star. |
With
the improved angular resolution of the Thirty Meter Telescope
(TMT), astronomers will be able to track the orbital motions
of many (~ 100) more stars at the GC (see Figure 2). Furthermore,
the orbital motion of each of these stars will be measured with
astrometric precisions 10 times finer than currently possible.
As a result, the shape of the gravitational potential through
which the stars move will be mapped out in exquisite detail (Figure
3). For an astrometric precision of ~ 100 µas, a conservative
estimate of the capabilities of the TMT, General Relativistic
effects, which show up as deviations from pure Keplerian (elliptical)
motion, can be measured even for single orbits of known stars.
At a precision of ~ 10 µas, the TMT can measure how quickly
the BH is spinning by looking for the "dragging" of
stars that pass through the swirling space-time near the BH.
Such a measurement has far-reaching implications, from constraining
the formation process of the BH to testing alternate theories
of gravity.
In
addition to detecting such General Relativistic effects, with
an astrometric precision of ~ 100 µas the TMT can detect
slight perturbations to the orbital motions induced by the extended
matter distribution surrounding the BH. This extended matter
may be dominated by a cusp of exotic dark matter remaining from
the Galaxy's formation process. Scattering of stars by encounters
with solar mass BHs, which are expected to inhabit the GC in
great number, would also be detectable. This could help constrain
the currently uncertain mass distribution of solar mass BHs.

Figure
3. Required astrometric precision for detecting GR
effects associated with relativistic prograde precession,
extended mass within the stellar orbits, and frame-dragginge
effects due to the spin of the BH (based on Weinberg
et al. 2005). The estimates are based on a mock sample
of stellar orbits observable with a TMT (thick, solidlines).
The dashed line shows the expectations for the star
S0-2, whose orbital period is just 15 yr. These plots
assume the stars are observed over a 10-yr baseline
with 10 integrations per year. Low-order GR and extended
matter effects are easily detectable (at the > 5-sigma
level) with a precision of ~100 µas, while
the detection of BH spin requires either better precision
or improved SNR from the observation of multiple
stars over multiple orbits. |
The
wealth of information gained from a decade of GC imaging at high
angular resolution has also yielded numerous puzzles related
to the stars themselves and the accretion physics of the central
BH. The unparalleled imaging capabilities of the TMT can directly
address many of the most outstanding questions. In particular:
(1) how did the monitored stars, whose spectral features suggest
that they are young (< 10 Myr), come to reside in a region
so close to the supermassive BH and thus so inhospitable to star
formation? (2) Why is the emission from the accreting central
BH, as measured by multiwavelength imaging of SgrA*, so dim compared
to that of massive BHs at the center of other galaxies, and what
is the origin of the large flaring behavior, seen most readily
in the infrared? These questions relate to the more global issues
of galaxy formation and massive BH growth and their complicated
interplay with star formation in dense galactic nuclei. |