The Project Manager’s
Corner: Our Owners Meet
Gary Sanders, TMT Project Manager
July 2006
A great telescope captures the public mind. When I travel and
meet a stranger on an airplane and tell them what I am working
on, the almost invariable reaction is fascination. To look into
the farthest and oldest reaches of the Universe, to spy on the
birth and death of stars, to uncover a hint of a planet around
a distant sun, is high romance and wonder. And to design and
build the giant instrument that makes this possible is an adventure
in itself.
Telescopes have been built by private initiative. They have
also been built by public funding. These initiatives have been
stimulated by high public interest and wonder. The public owns
the telescope through its excitement. A great telescope is a
public trust.
In 1604, a new star appeared in the sky and it was an exciting
public event. Four years later, the world’s first telescopes
were built by hand by Lipperhey and then by Galileo, and were
financed by these builders themselves. Galileo pointed his telescopes
at the heavens and made great discoveries. He named celestial
objects after potential benefactors and presented them with
the named discoveries and the actual telescopes. These were
sly fundraising gifts. This strategy led to patronage and more
telescopes. Note that these benefactors were people like Cosimo
II, Grand Duke of Tuscany. Galileo’s “private” benefactors were
nobility and royalty. This began a tradition in Europe of noble
patronage of telescopes.
The 1844 Great Refractor installed at Harvard was funded by
the citizens of Boston, who raised the necessary funds. They
were excited by the appearance of a bright comet in the 1830’s.
This was genuine private fundraising. This marks the beginning
of a tradition in the United States of private support of astronomy.
The telescopes of the United States were long supported by
private sources and then owned by universities or privately
endowed observatories. The astronomers who gained access to
these telescopes were members of these elite private institutions.
They felt and acted as though they were the owners of the telescopes.
The 100-inch Hooker telescope on Mount Wilson, finished in 1917,
was funded by its namesake, John D. Hooker, and the Rockefeller
Foundation, and operated by the Carnegie Observatories (with
later additional private support by Caltech). The 100-inch reigned
supreme in astronomy until the 1948 arrival of the 200-inch
(5-meter) Mount Palomar telescope, also funded by the Rockefeller
Foundation and operated by Caltech. The reign of Palomar gave
way to the first 10-meter Keck telescope in 1992, funded by
the Keck Foundation and operated by Caltech and the University
of California (UC). There are many other such examples. The
private tradition has thrived in the US.
In Europe, the tradition of royal support of astronomy became
government support and, in recent decades, has endowed many
European observatories, notably the telescopes of the European
Southern Observatory in Chile. Government support of astronomy
in the U.S. emerged only in 1957 with arrival of the US National
Science Foundation to astronomy. By creating Kitt Peak National
Observatory (which later became part of today’s National Optical
Astronomy Observatory), telescopes were constructed for a broader
community of astronomers funded by government resources.
When the U.S. National Academy of Sciences released its 2001 decadal
survey of astronomy for the next decade, its highest priority
ground-based initiative was described as a 30 meter-class
telescope with half of its funding from public and half from
private or international sources. This recommendation explicitly
called for uniting the two previously disparate traditions
in the United States. Motivated by the scale of such a project,
it is a new model of sponsorship, ownership and science exploitation.
It was with all of this in mind that I looked around me at
a meeting of the TMT Board of Directors on July 6. TMT formed
in 2003 when its two privately supported astronomy partners,
Caltech and UC*, made agreements with a new public partner,
the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA),
which operates the National Optical Astronomy Observatory. They
also made an agreement with the Association of Canadian Universities
for Research in Astronomy (ACURA), representing an international
partner. This united the patronage of the Gordon and Betty Moore
Foundation, supporting Caltech and UC, with the U.S. National
Science Foundation supporting AURA, and Canadian governments,
national and provincial, supporting ACURA.
This July 6 quarterly meeting considered many issues such as
site selection, recommendations from the recent Conceptual Design
Review, deliberations by the Science Advisory Committee on science
and instrumentation priorities, and emerging cost and schedule
planning. The members of the Board number 12, three from each
partner. They include the Provost of the University of California,
the Vice Provost of Caltech, the President of AURA, the Directors
of the Gemini Observatory, the National Optical Astronomy Observatory,
the University of California Observatories (including Lick Observatory),
and the Hertzberg Institute of Astrophysics, and a number of
senior astronomers and university administrators. Like any Board
of Directors they sit and act as the owners. Their mandate flows
from the institutional commitments that they are carrying out
(thus the Provosts and Presidents on the Board) and the astronomy
constituencies that they serve (thus the observatory directors).
They act as owners, but they are surrogates for fiduciary owners
and the astronomy owners.
And they are surrogates for the excited public who, as in the
early 1600’s and the 1830’s, owned the excitement that spurred
on royalty and industrial barons alike, and the intermediary
astronomers who sat on mountain tops at night and brought the
excitement down to Earth. The people who own the excitement
own the telescopes. That is the public trust.
*Note: Although the University of California
is a state-supported public university, it plans to raise the
bulk of its contribution to TMT from private sources. |